Monitoring Station A recorded increased small earthquakes over three days. Gas measurements also rose, while the lake temperature stayed almost unchanged. Scientists note that these signals can indicate changing volcanic activity, but they do not prove exactly when or whether an eruption will occur.
Fluency check: read the source aloud once at a natural pace, pausing where the punctuation tells you to.TERM 3 · WEEK 1
Disaster Detectives

Investigate the clues. Read the data. Explain what the evidence suggests.

ENGLISH
Disaster Word Lab
01 · Disaster Word LabWelcome to the Disaster Word Lab. Scientists use meaningful word parts to unlock unfamiliar vocabulary before they investigate evidence.
WHAT AM I LEARNING?
I can use subject-specific vocabulary accurately.
Technical vocabulary is useful when it makes an explanation more exact. Define unfamiliar terms through context and use them consistently.
- STEP 1Read each whole word first.
- STEP 2Find the base word or root that carries the main meaning.
- STEP 3Look for a prefix or suffix and say what that part adds.
- STEP 4Put the parts back together and explain the whole word in your own words.
A habitat is the place an organism lives and gets what it needs to survive.
Which term means material thrown into the air during an eruption?
Build the hazard word
Drag or tap the meaningful word parts into the two slots. Then match the completed word to its meaning.
What does the completed word mean?
Do the main mission first, then complete this section. It is deliberately more independent than Year 4 and is part of your weekly homework workload.
CHECK THE CORE IDEA
Which term means material thrown into the air during an eruption?

ENGLISH · SCIENCE
Read the Warning Signs
02 · Evidence DeskYou are at the evidence desk. Your job is not to guess an eruption — it is to read the monitoring log, compare clues and make only the conclusion the evidence supports.
WHAT AM I LEARNING?
I can distinguish fact, opinion and claims that need evidence.
A reliable claim can be checked against evidence. Look for named sources, data, direct observations and whether the writer separates fact from viewpoint.
- STEP 1Read all three days before deciding anything.
- STEP 2Compare the tremor count, gas reading and temperature across the days.
- STEP 3Choose at least two observations that support your inference.
- STEP 4Use cautious words such as suggests, may or could when the evidence is uncertain.
- STEP 5State one conclusion the short monitoring log cannot prove.
‘The river rose 42 cm’ is checkable data. ‘It was the worst day ever’ is a viewpoint unless a measure is provided.
Which claim is most responsible?
Inspect the warning signs
Tap each day, inspect the instruments, and collect evidence. Then decide what the evidence supports.
Your evidence cards
Inspect an instrument to collect evidence.
Observation, inference, or unsupported claim?
An observation is recorded. An inference is worked out from evidence. An unsupported claim goes further than the evidence allows.
How certain can we be?
Choose the language that best matches this three-day monitoring log.
Do the main mission first, then complete this section. It is deliberately more independent than Year 4 and is part of your weekly homework workload.
CHECK THE CORE IDEA
Which claim is most responsible?

ENGLISH · SCIENCE
Explain the Evidence
03 · Explanation StudioTurn your investigation into a scientific explanation. The goal is to connect observations to a careful conclusion, not to make the disaster sound dramatic.
WHAT AM I LEARNING?
I can explain how or why something happens using a logical sequence and precise vocabulary.
Explanations organise causes, processes or relationships. Use technical vocabulary where it adds precision and link ideas with cause-and-effect language.
- STEP 1Plan the first paragraph: describe the pattern across the three days and include specific data.
- STEP 2Explain why those observations are evidence of increasing activity.
- STEP 3Plan the second paragraph: state what the evidence suggests using may, could or suggests.
- STEP 4Add a limitation — something this three-day log cannot prove or predict.
- STEP 5Read both paragraphs again and remove any claim that sounds more certain than the evidence allows.
Rain enters the drain, then flows into the stream. Because the drain connects to the waterway, litter can reach the moana.
Explain what the evidence suggests and clearly state one limit on what can be concluded.
Build the reasoning before you write
First arrange the reasoning chain. Then collect at least three real data details for your plan. After that, write the explanation in your own words.
1 · Put the explanation chain in order
2 · Collect evidence for your paragraphs
Sentence models
The evidence suggests… This may mean… However, the data cannot tell us…Do the main mission first, then complete this section. It is deliberately more independent than Year 4 and is part of your weekly homework workload.
YOU TRY
Explain what the evidence suggests and clearly state one limit on what can be concluded.
Minimum guide: 110 words. Quality matters: make the reasoning, evidence or design decision clear.
MATHS
Ashfall Measurement Lab
04 · Disaster Data CentreAt the Disaster Data Centre you will treat ash depth as measured data. Read every value with its unit before comparing the set.
WHAT AM I LEARNING?
I can interpret and compare data, describe patterns and justify conclusions.
Read scales carefully, compare categories or time points and distinguish the data from your explanation of why a pattern might exist.
- STEP 1Read the six ash-depth measurements and keep the millimetre unit with the values.
- STEP 2Find the highest and lowest measurements.
- STEP 3Count how often 6 mm appears.
- STEP 4Decide whether the variable is categorical, counted discrete data or measured continuous data.
If one category rises from 24 to 36, the increase is 12. The graph shows the change; another source may be needed to explain its cause.
1) Station A records 12 mm and Station B records 18 mm. How many millimetres more did Station B record? 2) Measurements are grouped as 0–9 mm: 2 readings; 10–19 mm: 5 readings; 20–29 mm: 3 readings. Which group has the greatest frequency?
Measure the six ash samples
Tap a sample to move the ruler beside it, read the depth, then choose the measurement. You can also drag the ruler across the bench.
Now classify the variable
Categorical describes groups. Discrete numerical is counted. Continuous numerical is measured.
Do the main mission first, then complete this section. It is deliberately more independent than Year 4 and is part of your weekly homework workload.
CORE YEAR 5 QUESTIONS

MATHS
Ashfall Data Briefing
05 · Hazard Briefing RoomNow brief the response team with a data visualisation. Build the dot plot first, then say what the data shows and what it cannot tell you.
WHAT AM I LEARNING?
I can use evidence to recommend an action.
A recommendation should link evidence to a decision. State the evidence, explain what it means, then justify the action you propose.
- STEP 1List the six values in order so none are missed.
- STEP 2Draw or build a scale from 4 to 8 and label it ash depth (mm).
- STEP 3Place one dot for each measurement: 4, 5, 6, 6, 6 and 8.
- STEP 4Write one conclusion that names a number or frequency from the plot.
- STEP 5Write one question the ash-depth data alone cannot answer.
Because the busiest area has twice as many visitors, placing an extra sign there is supported by the data.
Recommend one sensible monitoring action using the evidence, while avoiding a claim the data cannot support.
Build the ash-depth dot plot
Drag or tap each measurement token onto the matching value. Repeated values stack. Then use the finished plot as evidence.
Read your finished graph
Tap the maximum value.
Which conclusion is supported by the data?
What can this dot plot NOT tell us?
Do the main mission first, then complete this section. It is deliberately more independent than Year 4 and is part of your weekly homework workload.
YOU TRY
Recommend one sensible monitoring action using the evidence, while avoiding a claim the data cannot support.
Minimum guide: 80 words. Quality matters: make the reasoning, evidence or design decision clear.
Hazard Sweep
06 · Hazard MapReveal safe tiles, use number clues to infer nearby hazard zones, place warning markers, collect six sensor readings and locate the marae community refuge. Your first reveal is always safe.
Use the clues. Mark the hazard zones.
Reveal safe tiles to uncover number clues. Each number tells you how many hazard zones touch that tile. Use the evidence to decide where warning markers belong. A hazard hit costs one strike; three strikes reset this training board.
Marae support point
In this fictional response scenario, the marae is supporting whānau with kai, bedding, water and communication. Keep using the map evidence to identify the remaining hazard zones.
Your sensor readings
Use the readings you collected during the game. Which value occurs most often?
Do the main mission first, then complete this section. It is deliberately more independent than Year 4 and is part of your weekly homework workload.
YEAR 5 GAME CHECK
Finish the game first, then use the learning from this week to clear these three final rounds.
Detective Debrief
07 · Detective DebriefFinish at the debrief room. Check how the three main detective skills feel now: word parts, evidence and data.
WHAT AM I LEARNING?
Reflect on independence, challenge level and the next useful Year 5 practice step.
Good learners notice both what feels secure and what deserves another go. Reflection helps you choose the next useful practice instead of guessing what you need.
- STEP 1Rate yourself as a Word Detective, Evidence Detective and Data Detective.
- STEP 2Choose Got it, Needed help or Want another go for each skill.
- STEP 3Pick one skill you would most like to revisit next.
How did you avoid turning evidence into a stronger claim than it supported?
How did this week feel?
There are no right or wrong answers. Choose what feels true for you.